Transcript (en)

It's the basic power of the models towards everything. Social relationships, job market, cyber attacks, bioterrorism attacks. We've crossed the threshold of capability that this is by far the most dangerous technology ever invented. And it'll have pervasive effects in the economy and how war is fought. One of the arguments to pace the frontier to slow development is to figure out how to build those systems in a more robust, more testable way. Would you support a slowdown if that was the goal? A true slowdown is very hard to induce because there you get people say, okay, will China agree to go along with that? And would you be able to audit compliance with that? Somewhat like we're able to do with nuclear weapons production. If you don't accept that, then you sort of say, okay, what the heck, let's go full speed ahead. which I wish there was a clear proposal that would be globally enforceable to slow down. I would be one of the people who would say, yeah, we should probably do that. But there is no credible proposal that makes that work. And so it's not really the center of today's debate. Today's debate is literally whether the government should even pay attention to the dangers here. You don't even have to show what you're doing. It's a, oh, voluntary, call me if you'd like type thing, which is clearly inadequate to the most dangerous weapon of all time.