Lomachenko skips Suarez for Cacace title shot
Two fights. That's apparently the distance between Vasiliy Lomachenko and undisputed, which is why the rumor about his return points at WBA champ Anthony Cacace instead of Charly Suarez. Algieri gets it. Suarez is a live dog but there's no belt on the line, while Cacace is a straight shot back into the title picture. Garcia isn't blinking either, and honestly the history backs him up. Loma's whole pro career started with a title chase. Second fight as a pro was for a belt, he lost the first attempt to Salido, then got it done. Coming out of retirement and walking right into a title fight is just the pattern. Beat Cacace and he's in line for undisputed, because Navarrete and Shakur Foster are fighting over three belts. So do you take the tune-up in Suarez or skip him and go get the strap?
Transcript (en)
with Lomachenko. I love the way Lomachenko is. When he came from the Olympics to the pros, he only wanted to do one thing, his fight for the title. It wasn't his first fight, but it was his second. He came up short, experienced whatever it was, salido just so much experience and being a little dirty and all that, and pulled off the win. But coming back after a few years of retirement, straight into the title fight, you know that's Loma man that's Loma that's Loma Loma's not you know he has I think he has a dream of being undisputed and winning this fight puts him in line to become undisputed because Navarrete and Shaki Foster are fighting for three belts so he's all he has to do is two fights two fights away
