Transcript (en)

Everybody talking about the Dirk trial doesn't understand this very simple sentence. The Vicar charge is the Los Angeles murder. There is no Chicago murder that he is charged with. Vicar. Violent crime in aid of a racketeering enterprise. What is the violent crime? It's the murder of Lil Pab. The one he was acquitted of joining any conspiracy to stalk that man. He was acquitted of paying to murder that man. And nobody gets this. People are, oh, there's a Chicago murder. The Chicago murder is the enterprise. they're saying that Dirk Banks directed, aided, and abetted or in other way was criminally responsible for the killing of Lopab. And it was part of an enterprise. What's the enterprise? Well, look, they sell drugs. They do other murders. There's this thing in Chicago. There's this, there's that. But at the end of the day, if he's not criminally responsible for the Los Angeles murder, the Vicar charge is the Los Angeles murder, then he's not guilty on the Vicar. And the double jeopardy motion is very simply going to argue that you can't charge me with being criminally responsible for the Los Angeles murder when the jury already acquitted me on the conspiracy to stalk and the conspiracy for murder for hire. If you can't respect that, your whole perspective is whack and you need to fade to black. You need to stop talking about the Vicar. You don't get it. Can the government put in a superseding indictment with the Chicago murder? Absolutely. It'll be the fifth superseding indictment. You can go ahead and post when that happens. Okay. Until then, zip it.