England for the English debate
The author asserts that universal suffrage will ultimately destroy Western countries, attributing this predicted collapse to what they describe as 'stupid-headed women.' This opinion frames a recorded exchange between an interviewer and a woman wearing red clothing. The interviewer begins by asking if she subscribes to the idea of 'England for the English.' She rejects this notion, stating her belief that England belongs to everyone. She notes that she resides in London, which she characterizes as a deeply multicultural environment where, in her view, every person is welcome. She mentions having friends across various races and skin colors. Her stance is that anyone should be permitted to enter and act as they wish, provided they do not commit crimes. When the interviewer turns to her companion and asks if they share this indifference, the friend confirms they feel the same way. The interviewer then presses the woman in red on whether she remains indifferent to the potential demographic transformation of England, specifically posing a scenario where the population becomes 99 percent non-English and non-white. She replies that she remains indifferent so long as individuals contribute to the economy and refrain from stabbing, shooting, or causing harm. She explains her personal context, noting that her family includes mixed-race cousins, their partners, and their children. Although the interviewer observes that both her parents appear white, she clarifies that her extended family is mixed-race and that this reality does not bother her. She accepts anyone regardless of background. The interviewer challenges whether the nation would still constitute England if ethnic English people were no longer the majority. The woman argues that such logic could apply to any country, using Thailand as an example. She suggests that if she expressed a desire to live in Thailand for ten years, she might be rejected for not being Thai, yet she wishes to reside there and contribute economically. The interviewer counters that foreign nationals cannot purchase land in Thailand unless they are ethnic Thai. He further contrasts this with British norms, noting that a black person born in Britain is considered British, whereas a white person born in China is not typically labeled Chinese. The woman maintains that anyone born and raised in Britain is British. She states she does not judge based on skin color and believes that everyone living in Britain appears British to her. The interviewer disputes this, asserting that white Britons built the country. The woman laughs. The interviewer remarks that she judged someone by their heels and makeup earlier, declares he has no further questions, and expresses regret over her viewpoint, claiming her country is being replaced. He challenges her assumption that newcomers do not form gangs or commit violent acts, hoping she avoids certain podcasts. She suggests they are on the wrong podcast. The interviewer warns that her daughter might end up with Pakistanis or Africans, which she doubts. He cites statistics regarding knife attacks committed by black and brown people, hopes she does not have a son who she would cover for, and calls her thinking sad. She concludes that she has said enough, realizes she is on the wrong podcast, and says goodbye.
