Colin Flaherty book black street predators
The discussion centers on a book published ten years ago by Colin Flaherty, which examines the psychology of black street predators and their frequently defenseless victims. A significant portion of the text relies on quotes from Marlon Newbern, an American forensic psychologist with approximately thirty years of experience working in prisons. The analysis describes these predators as exhibiting extreme narcissism. They envision themselves as two-meter giants who are bulletproof, exceptionally intelligent, beautiful, talented, and stronger than anyone else. This mindset is likened to the narcissism of a boy between six and twelve years old who imagines he is Superman or Batman. However, the subjects in question are adult men aged thirty, forty, or fifty who continue to live within this childish illusion. This specific category of African-American thugs is described as operating without personal responsibility or boundaries toward others. Within their peer groups, a lack of conscience during beatings or killings is viewed as a sign of strength and real power. Most of these individuals are functionally illiterate. Yet, they have learned from their elders to hate white people. They elevate pathological figures such as Trayvon Martin and George Floyd to the status of saints. This act is compared to white people naming a scholarship fund after Charles Manson or another white maniac. The victims selected by these predators are those unable to defend themselves, primarily white liberal women. Before being attacked, many white liberals perceived themselves as people of high morality and invulnerability. They believed their advanced liberal value system made them untouchable by black violence. Prior to victimization, they held the belief that unconditional acceptance of any black crime was an obligatory part of being a good person. White liberals imagine they stand on a moral height from which blacks cannot reach them. They are beaten because they are naive and easy prey. The conclusion drawn is that the difference between a white liberal and a right-winger is simply that the liberal has not yet encountered real black street chaos.
Transcript (en)
Don't Make the Black Kids Angry. It's a 10-year-old book by Colin Flaherty, who wrote about the dynamics of black street predators and their often helpless victims. But what was most interesting about this book was the fact that the author Flaherty quoted prison psychologist Marlon Newbern a lot. And let me please go through what he had to say because it's absolutely genius. They are extremely narcissistic. Black street predators believe themselves to be 10 feet tall, bulletproof, very smart, good-looking, gifted, and tougher than anyone. But that's the narcissism of the 6-12 year old boy who thinks they're Superman or Batman. But these are grown men in their 30s and 40s and 50s even who still think that way. This population of African-American thugs lives without any sense of personal responsibility or boundaries with others. When assaulting or killing someone, the absence of a conscience is considered among their peers as an indicator of strength and power. Most of them are functionally illiterate. But one lesson most all of them have learned from their elders is to hate white people They sanctify the most pathological people such as Trayvon Martin or George Floyd This would be like white people are naming a scholarship program after Charles Manson or the next white psychopath. And what about their victims? Well, they choose the ones who can't defend themselves, such as white liberal women. Interestingly, prior to being assaulted, many white liberals had harbored a sense of nobility and even invincibility since they had convinced themselves that their higher liberal moral value system exempted them from being attacked by black people. Prior to being victimized, white liberals believed in a blanket acceptance of all black crime as part of being a good person. You see, that's how this works. White liberals think they have the moral high ground as though black people won't be able to harm them there. But they do get attacked. Precisely because they're easy targets. Because they're naive. And so we conclude that the difference between a white liberal and a right winger is that the liberal hasn't experienced black street behavior yet.
