Joe Bartolozzi water debate
by Jeremias: Pop Trends
Joe Bartolozzi got into a tense argument with his chat over whether water is wet. He argued that "water is objectively wet because the definition of something being wet is having water molecules attached to it.
Transcript (en)
Yes, water's wet. This is the stupidest debate. I actually, no, is water wet is the dumbest f***ing debate. Water is objectively wet. Because the definition of something being wet is having water molecules attached to it. And when you say, is water wet, you're using the term water as a plural. You're saying water as a liquid substance in a container. You're not saying that is one singular water molecule wet. You're saying is water wet and water is other water molecules attached to other water molecules Therefore making water as a whole plural wet
