Not A Charm@not_a_charm

Follow

Buttigieg vs DeSantis Electoral College debate

Pete Buttigieg calls the Electoral College a relic of arcane, parochial politics from the 1770s that makes no sense, and Gavin Newsom is on board with that take. So is the majority of the modern Democratic Party. Ron DeSantis pushes back hard though, arguing that if you abolish it, you won't know who won the presidency for four weeks while California keeps counting. He's right to worry because swapping in a national popular vote means voters in California, Texas, New York, and Florida would decide every single presidential election. The 150 million people in the other 46 states become an afterthought since candidates wouldn't need to campaign in Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, or Wisconsin ever again; they'd just go where the population density is highest. America's Founders knew exactly what they were doing when they built this system to stop a few population centers from permanently overriding other states in a continental republic. The Electoral College forces candidates to form geographic coalitions instead of just accumulating high vote totals in specific cities. A disputed national popular vote would trigger simultaneous recounts across all 50 states which is a logistical nightmare. The current system limits disputes to specific states like Pennsylvania without requiring ballot audits in distant places like California. Buttigieg might call it outdated but the reality is it was a deliberate choice and it remains a brilliant system designed to prevent chaos. Sources: Politico, CNN, Heritage / Writer: Michael

2d

Not A Charm@not_a_charm

Follow

Buttigieg vs DeSantis Electoral College debate

Pete Buttigieg calls the Electoral College a relic of arcane, parochial politics from the 1770s that makes no sense, and Gavin Newsom is on board with that take. So is the majority of the modern Democratic Party. Ron DeSantis pushes back hard though, arguing that if you abolish it, you won't know who won the presidency for four weeks while California keeps counting. He's right to worry because swapping in a national popular vote means voters in California, Texas, New York, and Florida would decide every single presidential election. The 150 million people in the other 46 states become an afterthought since candidates wouldn't need to campaign in Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, or Wisconsin ever again; they'd just go where the population density is highest. America's Founders knew exactly what they were doing when they built this system to stop a few population centers from permanently overriding other states in a continental republic. The Electoral College forces candidates to form geographic coalitions instead of just accumulating high vote totals in specific cities. A disputed national popular vote would trigger simultaneous recounts across all 50 states which is a logistical nightmare. The current system limits disputes to specific states like Pennsylvania without requiring ballot audits in distant places like California. Buttigieg might call it outdated but the reality is it was a deliberate choice and it remains a brilliant system designed to prevent chaos. Sources: Politico, CNN, Heritage / Writer: Michael

2d