iFANN
    Search iFANN...
    Log in
    Home
    News
    Videos
    Photos
    GIFs
    Explore
    Polls
    Awards
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Rooms
    Notifications
    Messages
    Bookmarks
    Profile
    WikiAwardsiFAMOUSRankingsIndustriesCreator RewardsUser RewardsTermsPrivacyCommunity GuidelinesTakedown / DMCAHelpDevelopers

    © 2026 iFANN

    Home
    Search
    Messages
    Alerts
    Profile

    Post

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    🏢Supreme Court of the United States🏛️Harvard University💭Politics

    UCLA Law School admissions DOJ 2026

    Pick a race, any race, and try writing a rule that skips them on purpose. Since 1964, federal law has said you can't do that in either direction. That's the theory. For decades before it, and in plenty of offices after, the one group that could be legally passed over in admissions, in hiring, and in government contract decisions was white people. The word for it was never discrimination. Diversity was the label. Meanwhile the bar went down for one group and up for another, and Asian applicants got cut right along with white ones. That is the thing that cracked open the case against Harvard. 2023: the Supreme Court shut the schemes down at universities. 2025: the requirement for federal contractors to run affirmative action got dropped, and the majority finally got the same footing in lawsuits as everyone else. Paperwork doesn't sync to reality on day one. By 2026, the Department of Justice recorded that UCLA Law School was filtering out white and Asian applicants whose scores matched the ones it accepted. That gap between the statute and the office is the part worth staring at.

    1h

    18 Likes0 Dislikes3 Reposts0 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!

    Post

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    🏢Supreme Court of the United States🏛️Harvard University💭Politics

    UCLA Law School admissions DOJ 2026

    Pick a race, any race, and try writing a rule that skips them on purpose. Since 1964, federal law has said you can't do that in either direction. That's the theory. For decades before it, and in plenty of offices after, the one group that could be legally passed over in admissions, in hiring, and in government contract decisions was white people. The word for it was never discrimination. Diversity was the label. Meanwhile the bar went down for one group and up for another, and Asian applicants got cut right along with white ones. That is the thing that cracked open the case against Harvard. 2023: the Supreme Court shut the schemes down at universities. 2025: the requirement for federal contractors to run affirmative action got dropped, and the majority finally got the same footing in lawsuits as everyone else. Paperwork doesn't sync to reality on day one. By 2026, the Department of Justice recorded that UCLA Law School was filtering out white and Asian applicants whose scores matched the ones it accepted. That gap between the statute and the office is the part worth staring at.

    1h

    18 Likes0 Dislikes3 Reposts0 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!