iFANN
    Search iFANN...
    Log in
    Home
    News
    Videos
    Photos
    GIFs
    Explore
    Polls
    Awards
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Rooms
    Notifications
    Messages
    Bookmarks
    Profile
    WikiAwardsiFAMOUSRankingsIndustriesCreator RewardsUser RewardsTermsPrivacyCommunity GuidelinesTakedown / DMCAHelpDevelopers

    ยฉ 2026 iFANN

    Home
    Search
    Messages
    Alerts
    Profile

    Post

    Jolyon
    Jolyon@jolyon
    ๐Ÿ›๏ธDonald Trump๐ŸŽคBrandon J. Weichert๐ŸŒIran

    Brandon Weichert on Houthis and the US trap

    The trap isn't the strike itself. It's that a Saudi-led Gulf coalition is reportedly getting ready to hit the Houthis, possibly as early as next week, and Trump is weighing whether to jump in. From there, U.S. options stop looking like options. Join the operation and you're fighting a second major front before anything with Iran is settled. Sit it out and Riyadh starts wondering what the American security guarantee is even for. "Both options are bad," as the analyst puts it, and the military side may be worse than the political one. Airstrikes by themselves probably won't roll back Houthi gains. The PLC, the Popular Liberation Committee, has already had a rough time on the ground, and actually reversing the Houthis could demand a far bigger Saudi commitment down the line. Bab el-Mandeb sits right in the middle of all of it. "If you open up a front against the Houthis... while we haven't resolved anything with Iran, this is madness." That's the trap. The Iran war didn't fix America's Gulf security problems. It just created a new one in Yemen. Brandon J. Weichert, geopolitical analyst, Substack: the weichert brief, on Mario X Nawfal.

    1h

    30 Likes0 Dislikes5 Reposts3 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!

    Post

    Jolyon
    Jolyon@jolyon
    ๐Ÿ›๏ธDonald Trump๐ŸŽคBrandon J. Weichert๐ŸŒIran

    Brandon Weichert on Houthis and the US trap

    The trap isn't the strike itself. It's that a Saudi-led Gulf coalition is reportedly getting ready to hit the Houthis, possibly as early as next week, and Trump is weighing whether to jump in. From there, U.S. options stop looking like options. Join the operation and you're fighting a second major front before anything with Iran is settled. Sit it out and Riyadh starts wondering what the American security guarantee is even for. "Both options are bad," as the analyst puts it, and the military side may be worse than the political one. Airstrikes by themselves probably won't roll back Houthi gains. The PLC, the Popular Liberation Committee, has already had a rough time on the ground, and actually reversing the Houthis could demand a far bigger Saudi commitment down the line. Bab el-Mandeb sits right in the middle of all of it. "If you open up a front against the Houthis... while we haven't resolved anything with Iran, this is madness." That's the trap. The Iran war didn't fix America's Gulf security problems. It just created a new one in Yemen. Brandon J. Weichert, geopolitical analyst, Substack: the weichert brief, on Mario X Nawfal.

    1h

    30 Likes0 Dislikes5 Reposts3 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!