Jolyon@jolyon

Follow

A father got up at the sentencing hearing for the man who killed his son, an Army Veteran, and said what he had to say. Then he looked over and saw the Murderer laughing. He went at him. Authorities responded by charging the father with aggravated assault on a restrained or bound victim, and Jamie's read is that the taxpayers would have come out ahead if Pops had been allowed to finish the job instead. Eye-for-an-eye, basically. Navidad-Parra and the Father-in-law figure into the same case.

2d

Jolyon@jolyon

Follow

A father got up at the sentencing hearing for the man who killed his son, an Army Veteran, and said what he had to say. Then he looked over and saw the Murderer laughing. He went at him. Authorities responded by charging the father with aggravated assault on a restrained or bound victim, and Jamie's read is that the taxpayers would have come out ahead if Pops had been allowed to finish the job instead. Eye-for-an-eye, basically. Navidad-Parra and the Father-in-law figure into the same case.

2d