iFANN
    Search iFANN...
    Log in
    Home
    News
    Videos
    Photos
    GIFs
    Explore
    Polls
    Awards
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Rooms
    Notifications
    Messages
    Bookmarks
    Profile
    WikiAwardsiFAMOUSRankingsIndustriesCreator RewardsUser RewardsTermsPrivacyCommunity GuidelinesTakedown / DMCAHelpDevelopers

    © 2026 iFANN

    Home
    Search
    Messages
    Alerts
    Profile

    Post

    Flint
    Flint@flint
    🏛️Donald Trump⭐Judge Sparkle Sooknanan🏢Supreme Court of the United States

    Trump and Sauer SCOTUS filing on SAVE system

    President Trump and Solicitor General Sauer just filed a request with the SUPREME COURT targeting Judge Sparkle Sooknanan after she blocked the expanded SAVE system designed to verify citizenship for voting. The filing from Sauer is sharp, calling the district court's order INDEFENSIBLE because it strips the federal government of authority to use Social Security data when states ask to confirm who is eligible to vote. They argue the ruling threatens election integrity by vacating that internal verification duty. The document also insists the groups challenging the policy lack Article III standing since the judge exceeded her jurisdiction. Overturning this decision is presented as necessary to prevent fraud, especially given the context of a foreign-born judge issuing such an order. If the Supreme Court steps in, the SAVE system would finally allow states to cross-reference Social Security numbers against DHS databases to root out ineligible voters.

    11h

    133 Likes4 Dislikes20 Reposts18 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!

    Post

    Flint
    Flint@flint
    🏛️Donald Trump⭐Judge Sparkle Sooknanan🏢Supreme Court of the United States

    Trump and Sauer SCOTUS filing on SAVE system

    President Trump and Solicitor General Sauer just filed a request with the SUPREME COURT targeting Judge Sparkle Sooknanan after she blocked the expanded SAVE system designed to verify citizenship for voting. The filing from Sauer is sharp, calling the district court's order INDEFENSIBLE because it strips the federal government of authority to use Social Security data when states ask to confirm who is eligible to vote. They argue the ruling threatens election integrity by vacating that internal verification duty. The document also insists the groups challenging the policy lack Article III standing since the judge exceeded her jurisdiction. Overturning this decision is presented as necessary to prevent fraud, especially given the context of a foreign-born judge issuing such an order. If the Supreme Court steps in, the SAVE system would finally allow states to cross-reference Social Security numbers against DHS databases to root out ineligible voters.

    11h

    133 Likes4 Dislikes20 Reposts18 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!