iFANN
    Search iFANN...
    Log in
    Home
    News
    Videos
    Photos
    GIFs
    Explore
    Polls
    Awards
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Rooms
    Notifications
    Messages
    Bookmarks
    Profile
    WikiAwardsiFAMOUSRankingsIndustriesCreator RewardsUser RewardsTermsPrivacyCommunity GuidelinesTakedown / DMCAHelpDevelopers

    © 2026 iFANN

    Home
    Search
    Messages
    Alerts
    Profile

    Post

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    2w

    0 Likes0 Dislikes0 Reposts0 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!

    Post

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    2w

    0 Likes0 Dislikes0 Reposts0 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!