iFANN
    Search iFANN...
    Log in
    Home
    News
    Videos
    Photos
    GIFs
    Explore
    Polls
    Awards
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Rooms
    Notifications
    Messages
    Bookmarks
    Profile
    WikiAwardsiFAMOUSRankingsIndustriesCreator RewardsUser RewardsTermsPrivacyCommunity GuidelinesTakedown / DMCAHelpDevelopers

    © 2026 iFANN

    Home
    Search
    Messages
    Alerts
    Profile

    Post

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 Likes48 Dislikes90 Reposts3 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!

    Post

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 Likes48 Dislikes90 Reposts3 Comments
    ?

    Comments

    No comments yet. Be the first!