@estebankiwiNew CursorBench results are out, and Grok 4.5 is stealing the spotlight. It ranks #3 overall with a score of 66.7%, just behind Fable 5 Max at 70.5%. But the real story is in the cost column: Fable 5 Max costs $17.32 per task, while Grok 4.5 High comes in at just $1.51 per task. That's Fable-level performance at roughly one-tenth the price. Details at the link: #Grok
View original postPhoto by @estebankiwi· Jul 8, 2026· Grok
The image is a screenshot of a table comparing different AI models. The table lists models, their scores, cost per task, tokens per task, and steps per task. The row for "Grok 4.5 High" is highlighted with a red border. The overall aesthetic is clean and data-driven, with a dark background and white text. The highlighted row draws attention to the specific model's performance metrics.
BridgeMind Codex outage
GPT Astra vs Fable 5.1 benchmark
Qwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 Luna
Codex features and uptime chart
GPT Astra Thinking
Qwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench score
DeepSeek v4 Flash 284B beats GPT 5.6 Luna
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol
Kimi K3 sold out plans
Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus on AI Index
Kimi K3 vs Fable 5 game development poll
Kimi K3 launch rumors
Google Gemini 3.5 Pro release chart
OpenAI Codex unlimited usage
Artificial Analysis Coding Index Fable 5
Grok 4.5 live in Cursor
BridgeMind Fable 5 return party
Fable 5 coding debugging clarification@estebankiwiNew CursorBench results are out, and Grok 4.5 is stealing the spotlight. It ranks #3 overall with a score of 66.7%, just behind Fable 5 Max at 70.5%. But the real story is in the cost column: Fable 5 Max costs $17.32 per task, while Grok 4.5 High comes in at just $1.51 per task. That's Fable-level performance at roughly one-tenth the price. Details at the link: #Grok
View original postPhoto by @estebankiwi· Jul 8, 2026· Grok
The image is a screenshot of a table comparing different AI models. The table lists models, their scores, cost per task, tokens per task, and steps per task. The row for "Grok 4.5 High" is highlighted with a red border. The overall aesthetic is clean and data-driven, with a dark background and white text. The highlighted row draws attention to the specific model's performance metrics.
No comments yet. Be the first!
BridgeMind Codex outageGPT Astra vs Fable 5.1 benchmarkQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaCodex features and uptime chartGPT Astra ThinkingQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreDeepSeek v4 Flash 284B beats GPT 5.6 LunaClaude Opus 5 vs GPT 5.6 SolKimi K3 sold out plansKimi K3 vs Claude Opus on AI IndexKimi K3 vs Fable 5 game development pollKimi K3 launch rumorsGoogle Gemini 3.5 Pro release chartOpenAI Codex unlimited usageArtificial Analysis Coding Index Fable 5Grok 4.5 live in CursorBridgeMind Fable 5 return partyFable 5 coding debugging clarification
No comments yet. Be the first!